Virginia Four Wheel Drive Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455593321
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Virginia Beach, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7576473608
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,174
- Expenses
- $15,642
- Assets
- $86,729
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSE SCHNEIRLA (PRESIDENT)
- SANDRA SCHNEIRLA (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JESSE SCHNEIRLA (PRESIDENT)
- SANDRA SCHNEIRLA (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MELISSA WOOD (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote responsible four-wheel-drive recreation and to educate the public on off-highway vehicle safety, environmental stewardship, and sustainable land use. The organization conducts educational programs, organizes trail conservation and maintenance projects, and works to preserve public access to recreational lands through responsible use and community involvement. and community involvement.
What it reported doing in 2025
Annual trail ride used to raise money and food donation to the nelson county pantry. 2025 ride produced a total of $4,167 of direct and indirect donation as well as 1,768 pounds of food
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 19.8%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 22.7%; rating input score 23
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.5%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.54; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 19.8% of revenue deployed · 22.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.