Virginia Crop Production Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
540796263
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Clayton, NC, USA
Phone
9192655460
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,781
Expenses
$63,886
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUCAS HOUSEHOLDER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JASON LIPINSKI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NEIL HOUFF (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ANDREW SAUNDERS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MARK ALLEY (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose is a group of Agribusiness personnelwhos goal is to instruct VA Agribusiness dealers in the safe and proper usage of agricultural chemicals. In doing so, they work closely with Virginia Tech, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Department ofAgriculture and Consumer Services and various other groups such as

What it reported doing in 2025

The associations average membership is 150 and the membership dues provide the associations income. VACPA holds one educational seminar type meeting annually.In order to present the very best instructors at the lowest cost to membership, contributionsare solicited.In addition, at the meeting donations are accepted to the scholarship fund. At the meeting Virginia Pesticide Certification and Recertification are both provided as continuing education credits enabling members to maintain both their pesticide applicators license as well as their Certified Crop Advisor status.In addition, at the meeting donations are accepted to the scholarship fund. At the meeting Virginia Pesticide Certification and Recertification are both provided as continuing education credits enabling members to maintain both their pesticide applicators license as well as their Certified Crop Advisor status.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -60.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -48% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.