Virginia Chapter of Meeting Professionals International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311189151
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Phone
7043338445
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,089
Expenses
$27,646
Assets
$28,199
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARTINA JAMES (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE TEWKSBURY (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARTINA JAMES (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE TEWKSBURY (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • LORI LEIB (VP MEMBERSHIP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To be the pivotal force in providing meeting planners and suppliers superior educational networking and leadership development opportunities while establishing and implementing our plan to ensure membership growth, retention and future development of the chapter and its members and leadership.

What it reported doing in 2023

To be the pivotal force in providing meeting planners and supplies superior educational, networking and leadership development opportunities while establishing and implementing our plan to ensure membership growth, retention and future development of the chapter and its members and leadership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 25.3%; rating input score 25
  • Program expense ratio: 31.2%; rating input score 31

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 25.3% of revenue deployed · 31.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.