Virgin Islands Perinatal Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
660609857
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Christiansted, VI, USA
Phone
3407138083
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$621,781
Expenses
$401,328
Assets
$1,264,423
Liabilities
$35,522

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN HUNT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KAREN HUNT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $109,525 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase access to primary health care services and collaborate with public health & private provides to improve outcomes for low income, uniinsured/underinsured residents diagnosed with high risk pregnancy, diabetes and/or hypertension.

What it reported doing in 2023

Staff fluent in spanish and patois reduced barriers to care for some program enrollees by increasing their access to care which thereby improved their health outcomes and awareness of beneficial services. Clients were receptive to the nutirtion education which sometimes conflicted with their current food & lifestyle choices. During this cycle vi department of health (vidoh) services were disrupted by the abrupt relocation of all clinics and administrative offices. Vipi staff navigated clients to new locations, contact numbers and made new appointments and linked provider staff with clients when necessary. Vipi remains an active member of the vidoh chronic disease advisory, supported and participated in the training of community health workers provided by the vidoh. Funding was provided by the vi government.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.4%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 69.6%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.15; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.4% of revenue deployed · 69.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $279K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.