Virgie Giles Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 901029249
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-PF 2018, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Vallejo, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4156219899
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,461
- Expenses
- $41,169
- Assets
- $3,141
- Liabilities
- $243,661
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Calvin Chin (President/Treas)
People named in this filing
- Christopher Delaney (VP/Secretary)
- Calvin Chin (President/Treas)
- Andy Angeles (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. Tangible Structural PoliciesVirgie Giles Foundation identifies specific tangible needs of vulnerable communities which can be remedied through the development of structural policies in concert with modest funding. Once the policies are in place and the need has been addressed, Virgie Giles Foundation identifies and aligns with benefactors who are appropriate ongoing partners. 2. e-Commerce With A Purpose To ServeThe Virgie Giles Foundation POP UP has migrated to an online presence due to unforeseen circumstances of COVID-19. We now offer treasures through our website to support all projects related to Program Fabaceae and all environmental education and justice projects of Program Dahlia.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program A4AAA: Provided over 140 hours of assistance to clients in maintaining bookkeepingProvided over 60 hours of marketing assistance to clientsAssisted Artists to apply for grants from other foundations
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.8%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 33.5%; rating input score 34
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 77.57; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -57.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.8% of revenue deployed · 33.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.