Vine Life Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680026528
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lincoln, CA, USA
Phone
9166450160
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,018,334
Expenses
$1,214,842
Assets
$181,238
Liabilities
$91,410

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC G LONG (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ERIC G LONG (President & CEO): $85,280 total reported compensation
  • BLAKE J LONG (Treasurer): $82,880 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide food relief to the hungry in our local community. To train, counsel, and provide reliefto the youth of our community through safe after school spaces, activities and training in life skills. To provide a bobust homeless care program to the homelss of our local community. To operate a thrift shop in which we raise funds for our other charitable acitvities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Vine life ministries purpose and missin of enhancing and improving the lives of the young people and their families, in the city of lincoln and surrounding communities, directs the salt mine, a subsidiary of vine life ministries, inc. In advancing toward this goal by offering childrens program, youth program, and adult training and teaching, as well as an aggressive feeding program that provides emergency food for needy families in the target area. The salt mine has furnished over two million meals to local families, and of this number, sixty - seven percent were for youth and childern. The salt mine provides a food box for needy familites that will feed each person in that particular familyy three meals a day for a week. Food boxes for emergency needs are limited to one box per month. In addition, the salt mine adminsters the usda distribuition program, and low income families can receive two usda distribuition each month. In addition to the organized and regulated food program, the salt mine offers daily meals to transient and distribuites truckload of food on saturday on a first come first serve basis. This work is accomplished at the salt mine by staff and an army of voluteers from the community. Each week, our organization receive around five thousand pounds of donated food from the community, food we purchase from the food bank, and the food we receive from direct contactwith food ventors. The volunteers then sort, package, and box food for needy families. Other workers screen the requests for food and keep records of who receives food and how often. Funding for the salt mine comes from grants, donaitons from firends of the salt mine, and the proceeds from two thrifts shop, the salt seller and the salt mine thrift shop both located in lincoln.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 42.9%; rating input score 43; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.