Vincentian De Marillac
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251202628
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123612833
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,674,431
- Expenses
- $7,310,363
- Assets
- $21,439,679
- Liabilities
- $35,725,389
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEAN OWREY (PRESIDENT, CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DEAN OWREY (PRESIDENT, CEO): $338,950 total reported compensation
- PATRICIA EMBREE (COO): $274,341 total reported compensation
- LAURIE CANNELLA (CNO & VP CLINICAL EXCELLENCE): $196,893 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vincentian de marillac is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that preserves the human dignity of persons within a diverse and changing society."
What it reported doing in 2024
Vincentian de marillac provided long-term nursing care and skilled nursing care that included physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. Vincentian de marillac served persons of all religious backgrounds and income levels. In june 2019, the organization acquired the assets of schenley gardens, llc for $7,500,000. Vincentian schenley gardens is personal care facility located in the oakland area of pittsburgh.vincentian de marillac's nursing operations were discontinued in may 2023; however, the corporation remains open as a Pennsylvania corporation. Subsequent to june 30, 2023, vincentian collaborative system, the sole corporate member of vincentian de marillac filed a registration of fictitious name with the Pennsylvania department of state, bureau of corporations and charitable organizations, and on january 8, 2024 the fictitious name vincentian schenley gardens was registered. On january 27, 2025, the organization executed a purchase and sale agreement with nazareth literary and benevolent institution, a related party, for the purchase of certain land associated with the former vincentian de marillac campus for $100. On june 20, 2025, the organization sold the land and building associated with the vincentian de marillac campus to an unrelated party for $1,750,000. A gain of $1,706,062 was recognized during the year ended june 30, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.93; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.67; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $339K · 14 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $390K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.