Villages Woodworkers Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141851595
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lady Lake, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4084833250
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $458,056
- Expenses
- $406,154
- Assets
- $811,320
- Liabilities
- $172,028
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Valarie Pfundstein (President)
- Rod Badami (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Bob Becker (Director)
- Jim Bossmanm (Director)
- Joe Cunningham (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Villages Woodworkers Club Inc. is a club of woodworkers in The Villages Florida. The club makes and donates toys to local charities in the area. makes and donates pens to US Military makes and donates custom canes to disabled soldiers makes and donates urns to military and repairs public furniture upon request for cost of material and a donation. They make special projects if item is not for sale by local merchant. Members volunteer service. Revenue by donation. In addition the club has an extensive educational program for its members that focuses on improving members woodworking skills while with an emphasis on the safe and proper use of woodworking equipment.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Club repairs furniture and other wood items for community members upon request for the cost of the material used. Also special projects will take on special projects if an item is not available for sale by local merchants. Members volunteer their time for this work. During 2025 512 projects were completed with a total donation amount of $16,879. In addition the club sold items made by club member to members of the community for a total sales price of $35,052.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 51.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.6% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $325K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.