Village Shalom
Legal name: Village Shalom Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481199065
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Overland Park, KS, USA
- Phone
- +1 (913) 600-7481
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,087,191
- Expenses
- $31,642,499
- Assets
- $82,366,981
- Liabilities
- $98,365,969
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SIMON ABRAHMS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMIE PAREDES (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $176,543 total reported compensation
- MARK CAMPBELL (CFO): $161,575 total reported compensation
- DEBRA GILLETTE (DIRECTOR OF HR): $156,900 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Village Shalom – The Helzberg Campus for Jewish Living – is guided by Jewish values of respect, kindness, and community. While grounded in tradition, we proudly welcome people of all faiths and backgrounds into a vibrant, inclusive home where everyone belongs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Across the spectrum of our programs and services, village shalom is committed to a philosophy of providing care that supports the highest level of independence for an individual. Moreover, we are committed to providing seniors with the highest quality care regardless of their level of need, from basic retirement living to full nursing care, and regardless of their ability to pay. For over 100 years, village shalom has provided exceptional long-term care for seniors in the greater Kansas city area. We are pleased to be able to offer tailored programs and services to seniors in an award-winning innovative environment that provides maximum independence to our residents. Village shalom is, and remains, a leader within the senior living care industry. Village shalom commits time and resources and retains outstanding professionals devoted to developing new and innovative services that enrich the lives of seniors regardless of economic resources. Nearly forty percent of the residents at village shalom are recipients of more than $1.8 million in financial assistance. Our financial assistance program accomplishes our mission by ensuring all residents, even those who have exhausted their financial resources, or have come to us with no resources, are provided 24/7 nursing care, therapies, prescription management, engaging programming, individualized and group wellness opportunities, customized meals per dietary restrictions, and a safe and secure place to call home. Their dignity, privacy, and long-term care are our primary concern. No resident has ever been asked to leave due to the inability to pay for the cost of their care. This is unique in senior living and a point of pride for village shalom.the organization provides services to residents who meet certain criteria under its benevolent care policy at amounts less than its established rates. Because the organization does not pursue collection of amounts determined to qualify as benevolent care, the amounts are not reported as revenue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.6; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.19; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $177K · 31 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.