Village Life Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932702275
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Renton, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2066521290
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,471
- Expenses
- $221,468
- Assets
- $4,514
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARTIN LAWSON (CEO)
- ANTHONY TIBBS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARTIN LAWSON (CEO)
- MEKO LAWSON (PROGRAM ADMI)
- CHELSA MOST (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to disrupt the preschool to prison pipeline by forwarding the development of science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (s. T. E. A. M.) scholarship in the african american populace and providing solutions to contemporary global problems impacting the african diaspora.
What it reported doing in 2024
The we outside program will provide 10 weeks of outings for 4 cohorts of 25 youth each. These outings will include either a group bicycle outing, golf outing and lesson, or a tennis outing and lesson. The village life project will implement an evidence-informed youth empowerment solutions (y.e.s.) for peaceful leadership program. The program is to be rooted in a comprehensive understanding of the unique needs of communities impacted by firearm violence and the systemic inequities stemming from the war on drugs. The kukomaa program works with youth ages 14-16 in 3-month cohorts focused on rite of passage learning: cohorts take monthly field trips to experience the art culture in seattle and visit local tech companies. Highway to tech: this program saves taxpayers money by reducing the cost of incarcerating citizens. This is done by providing needed training, support, and guidance to marginalized persons which allows them to break cycles of poverty, crime, and incarceration. Current systems of justice and incarceration, that neglect to prepare citizens with the tools to elevate themselves to better stations in life, simply perpetuate cyclical conditions which cause taxpayers to repeatedly cover the cost of crime, homelessness, unemployment, and persons returning to incarceration where they require housing, food, and supervision. These incarceration costs are repetitive and do not assist the citizens efforts to change the behaviors that cause them to be incarcerated. While incarcerated these individuals are not contributing gainfully to society. Helpful opportunities for positive exits reentry program: many citizens returning to society after a period of incarceration have a history of abuse, addictions, and lack of positive role models. Nationally, over 40% did not have a high school diploma when arrested and read at a 7th grade level. Upon release they have few healthy support systems to guide their return to the community. Most are released from prison without money, job skills, a place to stay, or transportation to work. Many return to poverty-stricken neighborhoods where crime and violence are prevalent. Their intentions to live crime-free are soon forgotten. An ex-offender experiences frustration in securing basic needs of housing, food and clothing. Their felony record closes the door on many employment opportunities. Stress from lack of money, transportation, a felony record that limits job opportunities, and poor family relationships can often become overwhelming. Many return to addiction, crime, and violence, repeating the cycle of incarceration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $206K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.