Victory Village Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320380137
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Jackson, CA, USA
Phone
2092232286
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,901,599
Expenses
$1,947,451
Assets
$3,569,064
Liabilities
$3,393,247

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jason Mulford (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Nichole M Mulford: $133,135 total reported compensation
  • Michele Siefer (Board Director): $101,436 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Victory Village's purpose and mission is to develop affordable housing with innovative supportive services and programs for veterans, seniors, families, women and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, and vulnerability in underserved communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Ssvf/gpd: during fy25, victory village served 153 newly registered or renewed veterans and served 55 veterans through the supportive services for veteran families (ssvf) program.provided transitional housing to 33 veterans, 4 spouses, and 2 children, totaling 4,939 bed nights of shelter.provided permanent supportive housing units and housing stability services to 13 veterans/civilians and 4 children, totaling 6,047 permanent supportive housing bed nights.provided 653 housing services, including housing navigation, housing search and stabilization support; 49 employment services; 74 va navigation services to connect veterans with va benefits, healthcare, and other resources; 6 mental health services; 75 life skills services; 12 local benefit services; 43 legal services; 95 senior services; and 52 family support services.through transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, ssvf, and other victory village programs, veterans and their families were connected with critical resources and supports to prevent and end homelessness, increase income and self-sufficiency, access va and community benefits, address legal and employment barriers, and achieve long-term housing stability.vocational rehabilitation: provided 3,547.18 hours of on-the-job training and vocational rehabilitation services to 14 underemployed, unemployed, or underskilled individuals, including 9 veterans and 5 civilians, in the construction trades. Provided case management, hands-on skills development, and employment support to assist participants in achieving long-term employment goals, including industry certifications, licensing, job readiness, and development of marketable construction skills.provided 25 hours of clinical therapy to support participants in addressing mental health and personal barriers that may impact employment, training, and long-term stability.supports included training in punctuality, professional communication with co-workers and supervisors, creative problem solving, conflict resolution, appropriate workplace attire, proper care and use of equipment and tools, workplace safety, personal responsibility, and other skills necessary to obtain and maintain gainful employment.other program: served 18 justice-involved veterans through the veterans treatment court program during fy25. Provided 162 hours of clinical group therapy, along with case management, resource navigation, advocacy, and other individualized supportive services as needed. Services focused on addressing barriers that contribute to justice system involvement, supporting compliance with court requirements, connecting veterans to va and community resources, promoting long-term stability and recovery, and reducing the risk of recidivism.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.5%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 48
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.83; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.5% of revenue deployed · 48.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $942K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.