Vickis Cure Charity Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264216084
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Epilepsy

Reported finances

Revenue
$627
Expenses
$34,409
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOSHUA WITT (Director)
  • GERALD WITT (Director)
  • JOSEPH WITT JR (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation shall be organized exclusively for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, as now enacted or hereafter amended, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that also qualify as section 501(c)(3) exempt organizations. The corporation shall be committed to improving the health and well being of individuals and families in need. To this end, vicki's cure shall: encourage and support research and the developments of treatments and cures for various illness; support individuals, their families, and caregivers to create better access to quality healthcare for affected and in need individuals; and, expand public awareness of illness to promote earlier and accurate diagnoses by the medical community, increase the non-affected population's understanding of the illness, and encourage financial and other forms of support from public and private sources. All funds,

What it reported doing in 2019

Medical expense reimbursement

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5,387.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 100% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -42.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.