Via Art Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461396192
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6465684331
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,449,439
- Expenses
- $1,496,117
- Assets
- $2,530,977
- Liabilities
- $1,103,677
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHERINE WALSH (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- EMILY CAVANAGH (VICE-PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- BROOKE D ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BROOKE D ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $235,509 total reported compensation
- SUSAN L THOMPSON (DIRECTOR OF GRANTMAKING AND CURATORIAL RESEARCH): $100,756 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Via art fund is a nonprofit organization where art patrons join forces as partners in a new model of philanthropy to support visionary initiatives in art.
What it reported doing in 2025
Founded in 2013, the nonprofit organization has garnered global recognition for its bold yet rigorous grantmaking, as well as its unique philanthropic model centered upon a highly participatory donor engagement program. Via art fund supports artists, curators, cultural institutions, and biennials primarily in the united states yet increasingly worldwide, underwriting innovative artistic endeavors with far-reaching public impact realized in various forms including exhibitions, public installations, curatorial research, publications, symposia and more. Dedicated to promoting diverse voices and reaching broad audiences, via art fund champions artist projects that address today's pressing social, cultural, and artistic questions and that challenge notions of traditional exhibition circumstances. As a fast-growing grantmaker with expanding programs, via art fund offers a powerful platform for galvanizing arts philanthropy.via art fund grants exemplify via's grantmaking core values of artistic production, thought leadership and public engagement and are awarded in three grant programs: via's flagship artistic production fund, and the via curatorial fellowship. Via artistic production fund grants are awarded to fund the production, exhibition, (semi) permanent installation and/or institutional acquisition of new artistic commissions in the public realm. Via supports projects that challenge traditional exhibition environments; penetrate social, cultural, and economic barriers; and enlighten, inspire, and educate the public. When possible, via artistic production grants are made with the intention to gift a work of art to a public cultural institution once production and exhibition are complete, ensuring that via-funded artworks live on to encounter new audiences under the stewardship of public institutions. The via curatorial fellowship, an annual award in support of today's visionary curatorial voices, provides discretionary funds to a curator to enable aspirational research and reflection, supports travel and/or convenings or enables other scholarly endeavors that will enhance the curator's individual curatorial practice.the via education program is an integral part of the programming of via art fund. Via patrons meet semi-annually to review grant proposals accompanied by in-person or video presentations by artists, curators, and institutional professionals, and participate in the contemporary art landscape through an annual calendar of travel, studio visits, exhibition tours and other opportunities for interaction with the artists, curators and institutions supported by via. Through this high level of direct engagement, via supporters enjoy a deeper understanding of the creative process.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.2%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.2% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $236K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.