Vfw Department of California Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201343181
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Elk Grove, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9165098712
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Veterinary Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $424,430
- Expenses
- $684,842
- Assets
- $1,833,665
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBORAH JOHNSON (FOUNDATION PRESIDENT)
- DAVID KUTA (FOUNDATION VICE PRESIDENT)
- PAULA JANSEN (FOUNDATION VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RODGER W MEIER (SECRETARY/TREASURER (THRU 01/2025)): $110,200 total reported compensation
- PATRICIA WERNER (SECRETARY (AS OF 02/2025)): $39,250 total reported compensation
- DEBORAH JOHNSON (FOUNDATION PRESIDENT): $25,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide for the social well being of veterans of the various branches of the armed forces of the united states of america who has served in a foreign war.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide post relief for unexpected expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 70%; rating input score 70; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -61.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.68; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $654K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.