Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582680621
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2106985575
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Veterinary Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,468
- Expenses
- $38,563
- Assets
- $79,339
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEANNE PAWLISCH (President)
- ALYCE D'AMATO (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DEANNE PAWLISCH (President)
- BOB MESSENGER (Treasurer)
- DEB SILVERSTEIN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation's purpose is to fund selective educational, research and training projects that will raise the level of patient care for critically ill and injured companion animals. Special projects to include disaster refief funds may also be identified for veccf support.
What it reported doing in 2020
To support and work with emergency services to educate the public about disaster preparedness and assist in sheltering and evacuation of animals during a disaster.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.9%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 40%; rating input score 40
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.06; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.9% of revenue deployed · 40% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.