Veterans of Foreign Wars Shaw Leavens Post 2223

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
362260926
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Savanna, IL, USA
Phone
8152737090
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,962
Expenses
$9,204
Assets
$84,939

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • RODNEY J CLEMENS (COMMANDER)
  • ALEXANDRER G CHADWICK (SR VICE COMM)
  • DENNIS LONGNECKER (JR. VICE COM)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Social, civic, patriotic and educational, and in furtherance of same but not in limitation thereof (1) to encourage, preserve and strengthen the bond of comradeship among its members and all veterans of foreign wars; (2) to perpetuate the history of all veterans, whether living or dead, as well as others who served in foreign wars; (3) to assist, in any lawful manner, all worthy comrades, their wives, widows, children or orphans; (4) to foster true patriotism and (5) to encourage the maintenance and extension of institutions of american freedom, as well as the preservation and defense of the united states from all her enemies whomsoever. Not, however, including the payment of sick or death benefits, and not including the care of neglected or dependent children.

What it reported doing in 2024

Social, civic, patriotic and educational purpose to encourage, preserve and strengthen the bond of comradeship amoung its members and all veterans of foreign wars

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.23; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.