Veterans of Foreign Wars of the Us Sitts-halvorsen Post 5065
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 386142649
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Sheridan, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9892919680
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,891
- Expenses
- $72,995
- Assets
- $34,553
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Carol McBride (Quartermaster): $5,200 total reported compensation
- Terry Dowdell (Commander): $600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist veterans, their surviving spouses, dependents, and orphans, to serve the military and our communities, to advocate on behalf of all veterans, and to foster true allegiance to the United States of America
What it reported doing in 2025
Promote patriotism to the community and youth through the Patriots Pen Program, Voice of Democracy, Camp Trotter, Scouts, National Home, Safety, and Sponsorships
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 17
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 15.2%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 14
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 15.2% of revenue deployed · 13.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.