Veterans Navigation Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843207666
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Billings, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4064359308
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $915,850
- Expenses
- $632,276
- Assets
- $364,588
- Liabilities
- $1,065
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Blake Fuhriman (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Blake Fuhriman (President): $78,019 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Transition for service members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Resource navigation is incredibly important for veterans in transition out of the military. Finding the right person that can help the veteran to meet the need they have in a timely and compassionate manner is paramount to their success. Administrative red tape, broken processes, lack of knowledge, mental and physical health, and more can be barriers to veterans finding the right resources to help them transition, and VNN proudly and effectively helps veterans get the help they need with direct resource navigation and mentorship. Veterans received help that varied between an hour and 10s of hours depending on their level of need. Hundreds of referrals were made for veterans and their families to community partners to meet their various needs. Isolation is a key factor affecting veterans as they transition out of the military, and reintegration into society is a key component of their success. Veterans Navigation Network served hundreds of veterans and their families through our Vet Connect events and other veteran outreach activities, ensuring that they were not alone during their transition and had someone to walk by their side as they reintegrate. Many veterans also began volunteering through VNN and other service organizations as a direct result of attending the events that VNN facilitated. VNN attended dozens of community outreach events that assisted in getting information for success into the hands of veterans and their families, covering events throughout the state of Montana. 4) We facilitated dozens of peer/mentee matches throughout the year with many volunteer peer mentors. These matches mean that hours are spent goalsetting and walking alongside the veteran as they work to achieve those goals. Goals can range from starting their own business, finding employment, finding housing, and so much more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 111.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 69% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 85.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $545K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.