Veterans First

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237143157
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Santa Ana, CA, USA
Phone
7145470615
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$621,365
Expenses
$733,066
Assets
$40,106
Liabilities
$347,902

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEANNE TATE (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEANNE TATE (President & CEO): $27,781 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Veterans first is the only 501c (3) organization in orange county that works to provide services exclusively to our region's homless and at-risk veteransour organization provides a multitude of serivces including housing, meals, case management, life skills, mental health counseling, benefit counseling, transportation, as well asjob training and employment placement assistance.veterans first works with many reginal and national orgnaizations such as the national coalition of homeless veterans (nchv) vietnam veterans of america (vva) the american legion, elks club, am vets, veterans of foreign wars (vfw) disabled american veterans (dav) wounded warrior battalion - mcb camp pendleton, soldiers project and the orange county continium of care.one of veterans first's founding ebliefs is that the most effective way to assist the veteran in our program is a "veterans helping veterans" strategy, through this model we place incoming vets with a structured substance free environment with those v

What it reported doing in 2016

To provide food, clothing, transportation, training and housing or housing reimbursements to disabled veterans.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2,639.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.67; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -34.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $609K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.