Veterans Club - Del Webb Naples Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472480978
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Ave Maria, FL, USA
Phone
3176261249
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,094
Expenses
$47,977
Assets
$46,440

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark Clayton (President, Dir.)

People named in this filing

  • Helen Scorsone (Vice Pres, Dir.)
  • Jeff Plys (Secretary, Dir.)
  • Patrick Bachofner (Treasurer, Dir.)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to promote patriotism, provide benefit information and resources to our members and fellow veterans, raise awareness for veterans issues, and aid and assist needy veterans in our community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our accomplishments for 2025 include:- Naples Point-in-Time Homeless Veteran Count- Vietnam Veterans Recognition Day- Veterans Club Golf Challenge- Veterans Club Article in Ave Maria Neighbors Magazine- DelWebb Memorial Day Ceremony- Pavers placed for: Dick Ladd & Sonny Silvaroli- Music bingo- Veterans Club Article in Ave Maria Sun- Ave Maria University Hometown Heroes Football Game - Winter Clothes Drive- 1,800+ Christmas Cards Written for the Troops in Germany- Veterans Club Article in Ave Maria Simply Magazine- Veterans Day Pancake Breakfast- Diaper Drive with a collect of + 21,000 diapers and wipes

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.5%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.