Veterans Club at Encanterra
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811106408
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- San Tan Valley, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4802621002
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $124,808
- Expenses
- $64,263
- Assets
- $102,298
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jerry Kolesiak (President)
- Hendrik van Brenk (Vice President)
- Jeff Robinson (Vice President (partial year))
People named in this filing
- Jerry Kolesiak (President)
- Hendrik van Brenk (Vice President)
- Jeff Robinson (Vice President (partial year))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations primary exempt purpose is to raise funds to provide donations to local Veterans Support organizations which provide face-to-face and hands-on shelter, food, training and other services to local veterans.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization program service is to provide support to local military veterans by raising funds and distributing them to local veteran's support organization to help house, feed, and train veterans trying to adjust to civilian life. Funds for these grants are raised through an annual charity golf event. Grants distributed were $54,600 and total expenses for the fund raising event were $42,299 in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.9%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 65.8%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.5%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.9% of revenue deployed · 65.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.