Veteran Social Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832172065
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3106958383
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Temporary Housing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,172
- Expenses
- $137,763
- Assets
- $34,426
- Liabilities
- $136,044
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Darren Henden (President & ED)
People named in this filing
- Stephanie Taylor (Secretary and Chief of Operations)
- Deryk Howard (Treasurer)
- Darren Henden (President & ED)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing housing, peer support, mental health, vocational/employment, and case management services to United States veteran men, women and their children.
What it reported doing in 2022
Our services offer a comprehensive approach to support veterans. Through our organization, veterans receive housing, job training, assistance, and mental health support, including peer support and referrals to mental health services. Statistics for 2022: Total veterans served: 157 Veterans permanently housed: 12 Women veterans served: 10 Men veterans served: 79 Service calls related to housing: 70% Service calls related to benefits: 30% Service calls related to behavioral health services for mental health and substance abuse: 65% Veterans served through employment and vocational resources (job training and placement): 8 Veterans provided with mental health support, peer support, and referrals to clinical mental health care: 5
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.6%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 15.1%; rating input score 15
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.95; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.6% of revenue deployed · 15.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.