Versailles Gymnastics Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364530968
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Versailles, KY, USA
Phone
8595190318
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$164,116
Expenses
$127,697
Assets
$54,042

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHILLIP HERBST (President)
  • SCOTT SISLER (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • PHILLIP HERBST (President)
  • SCOTT SISLER (Vice President)
  • MELISSA HUDSON (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote amateur gymnastics and teams of agility gymnastics on a local, regional, and national basis. Providing assistance with meet fees, usag membership dues, coaching, certification, awarards, meets and providing scholarships to further the mission.

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary function of the Booster Club is to promote amateur gymnastics and the teams of AgilityGymnastics on a local, regional, and national basis. We achieve this in many ways, especially by helping toprovide assistance with the financial responsibilities associated with the sport at a competitive level. Thisincludes but is not limited to: gymnasts meet fees, USAG membership dues, coachs travel and sessionexpenses, coachs training clinics and certification, equipment essential for the team, hosting social activitiesfor the gymnasts and their families, awards at seasons end, hosting meets, and identifying deservingcandidates for scholarship funds.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.