Veronica B Smith Multi-service Senior Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222482914
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Brighton, MA, USA
Phone
6176356120
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$608
Expenses
$173,637
Assets
$12,063
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY D'ISIDORO (PRESIDENT)
  • MARISA ANGILLETTA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANTHONY D'ISIDORO (PRESIDENT)
  • MARISA ANGILLETTA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CURT BLETZER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The center is a human service agency which provides educational, cultural, social, recreational and community services to the elderly community of boston, ma.

What it reported doing in 2024

The center provides a comprehensive range of programs designed to meet the needs of the elderly community it serves, which includes enabling senior citizens to attain financial security, maintain their independence and remain in their neighborhoods. It is a focal point for elders to meet and receive a wide array of services. Programming includes health screenings, education, nutrition, fitness, hot meals, social events, information and referral services, tax preparation services, snap benefits, scam prevention, counseling for medicare open enrollment, housing, transportation and fuel assistance. Most of these services maximize elders' income and help them remain or move out of poverty.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -28,458.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.