Vero Beach Museum of Art Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591867408
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Vero Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7722310707
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $69,441,773
- Expenses
- $9,581,094
- Assets
- $109,565,806
- Liabilities
- $2,450,940
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRADY ROBERTS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRADY ROBERTS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $346,157 total reported compensation
- CARIDAD WEBER (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $121,909 total reported compensation
- JOHN SAFRANEK (CFO/COO): $41,367 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The vero beach museum of art provides cultural leadership and enrichment for the public through a wide variety of educational, studio art and humanities programs; a diversity of quality exhibitions; and the collection, preservation and presentation of important american and international works of art.
What it reported doing in 2024
Exhibitions & collections - the museum provides cultural enrichment for the public through temporary art exhibitions, exploration in the humanities, professional studio and classroom instruction for all ages, and a permanent art collection. New programs, supported by marketing strategies to reach new audiences are created to encourage increased participation. Exhibitions presented during 2024-2025 included: photographs by robert landau: rock n' roll billboards on the sunset strip (attendance 11,358); glass work by john miller: roadside reverie (attendance 9,991); monet to matisse - french moderns (attendance 36,002); robert farber's fashion photography - timelss (attendance 25,103); selections from the permanent collection (attendance 47,717); sculptures from the permanent collection (attendance 13,487).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.7%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.44; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.7% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $346K · 26 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.