Vermont Legal Aid Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030219366
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Burlington, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8008892047
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Legal Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,858,732
- Expenses
- $11,920,125
- Assets
- $5,976,370
- Liabilities
- $2,763,795
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA A OSKI (PRESIDENT/SE)
Highest reported compensation
- YASMIN DWEDARUNTIL 6152025 (EXECUTIVE DI): $168,432 total reported compensation
- JAMES W BROWN (CFO): $135,448 total reported compensation
- JOSEPHINE MORGAN (ASSISTANT TO): $134,055 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vermont legal aid provides free civil legal services to people throughout Vermont who are poor, elderly, or have disabilities and who would otherwise be denied justice or the necessities of life. Through its health care ombudsman and long-term care ombudsman programs, Vermont legal aid also provides information and advocacy for vermonters with questions about health care, health insurance, and long-term care.
What it reported doing in 2024
1. The disability law project provides legal services to individuals with disabilities. Services range from representation for the purpose of protecting civil rights and combating discrimination, to assuring access to necessary services. Total expenses = 848,781. 2. The elder law project provides services to eligible clients who are over the age of 60. These services are provided through a variety of activities including representing individuals who seek help through the various area agencies on aging, dual-eligible elderly medicaid recipients, and statewide advocacy on behalf of Vermont elders in the state legislature and with various agencies and government subdivisions. Total expenses = 774,578. 3. The long-term care ombudsman project assists residents of nursing homes and residential care facilities with quality of life or quality of care problems. The ombudsman is an independent advocate who helps residents resolve complaints and concerns. Total expenses = 970,969. 4. The housing discrimination law project is established to conduct a full- service, coordinated and comprehensive fair housing program under the private enforcement initiative of the u.s. Department of housing and urban development. Total expenses = 95,712. 5. Other projects includes the following: total expenses = 2,348,549. 1. The housing for everyone project is funded entirely by the emergency rental assistance program which was part of the american rescue plan act. The project has, since july of 2022, sought to increase housing stability and prevent homelessness by conducting outreach to all tenant/defendants in residential eviction cases filed in court, and provide legal help to all eligible tenants who respond to outreach. Legal help gives tenants options in the eviction process, and sometimes can resolve disputes and allow tenants to keep their homes permanently. 2. The homeowner legal assistance project provides legal services to low- to-moderate income Vermont homeowners at risk of losing their homes due to mortgage, property tax, homeowners association dues, or other property charge delinquency. The project also assists heirs needing proof of legal ownership of their home to avoid mortgage or property tax issues. 3. The medical-legal partnership project works with medical and social work providers to address their patients health-harming legal needs in a variety of areas, including safe housing, adequate income, and personal and family stability. By connecting with people through their medical home we are able to reach individuals and families who might not otherwise seek our services. 4. The victims rights project provides legal advice and representation to crime victims throughout the state of Vermont focusing on securing victims safety, security, and privacy. Our priorities include assisting survivors of elder abuse, domestic violence, and sexual assault.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $168K · 22 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.