Veritas Baptist College
Legal name: Veritas Baptist College Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272918042
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lawrenceburg, IN, US
- Phone
- (812) 221-1714
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Graduate, Professional Schools (Separate Entities)
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,929,860
- Expenses
- $1,891,118
- Assets
- $868,157
- Liabilities
- $355,069
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE LESTER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MIKE LESTER (PRESIDENT): $86,898 total reported compensation
- SHERRY DAVIS (CFO): $67,900 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Word of God, therefore, must be in fact the foundation stone upon which Christian education is built. Its truths must be the basis of all spiritual training and must also be integrated into every academic discipline. Rather than reflecting the mores of society, the values taught in Scriptures provide the spiritual compass that guides the Christian educational process. The culmination of the process should be spiritually mature graduates who apply the precepts of God’s Word to the problems of the real world. In doing so, the Christian brings glory to His Heavenly Father and compassionate help to society.
What it reported doing in 2025
Veritas baptist college exists to aid local churches in their task of equipping christians to fulfill the great commission. God has graciously gathered a dedicated and qualified faculty to equip believers to do the work of the ministry in order to build the body of christ. The goal is more than imparting academic knowledge; it is leading each student to spiritual maturity and christ-likeness. The college curriculum is organized to pursue this objective in a fourfold manner. 1.to train leaders and workers to serve in local churches and christian schools. 2.to train pastors and missionaries to plant and lead local churches. 3.to provide continuing education for pastors and church staff members who are serving in local churches. 4.to provide christians the opportunity for spiritual growth and spiritual enrichment. Since 1984, faculty and administration of veritas have developed personal mentoring relationships with their studentsfocusing on students unique personal and ministry needs. Vbc continues to accomplish its purpose with 334 graduates in 46 states, 2 us territories, and 15 foreign countries across 6 programs and 20 specializations. In the 2021-2022 school year, we had the privilege to help train 251 students. At veritas baptist college, we believe the cost of education shouldnt be a barrier to christs servants. We believe it should be affordable and flexible. To that end, we are committed to bringing trusted leaders directly to students. Stay home, serve locally, and connect globally with other like-minded believers pursuing their training. One bachelors graduate who has returned for an advanced degree stated, through veritas i have earned a degree, i have grown in the grace and knowledge of christ, i have gained friendships with people all across the world, and i have gained many valuable lessons that have shaped who i am today all while serving exactly where god has called me right here right now.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.5%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 65.5% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.