Verdugo Hills Hospital Medical Staff
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237455692
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Glendale, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8189524647
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $406,630
- Expenses
- $350,735
- Assets
- $1,372,216
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- HAPPY N KHANNA MD (CHIEF OF STAFF): $72,000 total reported compensation
- STEVEN HARTFORD MD (ASSISTANT CHEIF OF PATIENT): $36,000 total reported compensation
- ALEXANDRA M DARRAS (ASSISTANT CHIEF OF MEDICAL): $36,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To ensure high medical standards for usc verdugo hills hospital.
What it reported doing in 2025
Verdugo hills hospital medical staff is a membership organizaton that exists to work toward the goal that all patients admitted to the hospital or treated in the outpatient departments receive treatment commensurate with the high standards of the medical profession; to provide a means whereby issues concerning the medical staff and the hospital may be discussed by the medical staff with the governing body and the ceo of the hospital; to initiate and maintain rules and regulations for self-governance of the medical staff; to provide education and to maintain high educational standards; to support and assist in programs associated with community health needs; and to initiate and maintain rules and regulations for self-governance of the medical staff, to carry out its responsibility for the quality of the professional services provided by individuals with clinical privileges, as well as the responsibility of accounting to the governing body.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 50
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 79.5%; rating input score 80; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.91; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 54.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 4 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.