Venom Athletics and Sports Performance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933243301
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Dover, DE, USA
Phone
5032682536
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,903
Expenses
$49,605
Assets
$8,298

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALYSHA BRANNON (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BRIANNA CUNNINGHAM (CO-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ALYSHA BRANNON (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BRIANNA CUNNINGHAM (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • TODD MASON (DIR. OF OPER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide assistance within an athletic structure that promotes the development of well-rounded student-athletes through skillful sport and competition. Develop life skills of discipline, integrity, leadership, and social responsibility. Assure equitable opportunity for all staff and student-athletes. Make the athletic program a durable source of pride for our student-athletes.

What it reported doing in 2023

Provided assistance training and coaching to student-athletes

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.5%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.5% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.