Vandalia Heritage Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550768996
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
Phone
3045341177
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,507
Expenses
$219,876
Assets
$3,147,462
Liabilities
$383,431

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA KURTZ KUHNS (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • JEFFREY BURUM (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAURA KURTZ KUHNS (PRESIDENT/CEO): $5,708 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Revitalization of communities and neighborhoods through historic preservation, restoration/rehabilitation, and redevelopment of the built environment; and through its diverse and comprehensive community and economic development initiatives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Thomas revitalization initiative - soon after its inception in 1998, vhf began investing significant resources toward revitalization efforts in thomas, wv, a small, rural mountain community in the heart of central appalachia. When vhf initiated its first efforts in thomas, there were very few occupied commercial storefronts and not much tourism activity. Since then, vhf has preserved and stabilized numerous historic structures in the downtown (historic) commercial district, as well as on douglas road, a mile from downtown. These include properties owned by vhf, including the 1900 buxton & landstreet building or "b&l" (the former davis coal & coke company store); the 1920's peacock (formerly dibacco) building; and the later sagace building. All of these underwent complete renovations to accommodate both small business and residential uses. Vhf also invested its own funding in stabilizing other important local historic properties (owned by non-profits or local government), including cottrill's opera house on front street and the "engineering building" (formerly the davis coal & coke administration building adjacent to the b&l. As the dc&c flagship and one of the most prominent buildings architecturally in tucker county, the b&l is now listed on the national register of historic places and is one of the few remaining coal company stores. As new renovations are now required, vhf is focusing its attention on the b&l and has additional plans that could convert the upper level to affordable, short-term lodging to accommodate the growing tourism economy locally. The lower level features an art gallery and historic displays and due to the proximity of the nearby blackwater river and blackwater heritage trail, the b&l can also serve as a visitors' center and trailhead location. Additional exterior and interior amenities are planned for the site that will provide support to local small businesses, with a focus on the arts and outdoor recreationall in a manner that is compatible with preserving the important coal and coke industrial heritage of the area while educating new visitors.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -405.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.31; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $165K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $6K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.