Valley Womens Club Association of San Lorenzo Valley Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942900221
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Ben Lomond, CA, USA
Phone
8313351782
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$286,866
Expenses
$267,863
Assets
$357,693
Liabilities
$8,650

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dawn Harker (Co-President)
  • Kathryn Gafford (Co-President)
  • Elizabeth Marzili (Co-President)

People named in this filing

  • Alisan Andrews (Treasurer)
  • Roberta McPherson (Ex Secretary)
  • Nancy Macy (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dedicated to community action, awareness and leadership in environmental, educational, social and political concerns that affect the health and welfare of the San Lorenzo Valley and our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Valley Women's Club (VWC) of the San Lorenzo Valley is dedicated to community action, awareness, and leadership in environmental, educational, social, and political concerns that affect the health and welfare of the San Lorenzo Valley and our community. The VWC sponsors a wide range of special events relating to its mission, including the annual Environmental Town Hall, Candidate's Forums, workshops, and forums that address erosion, pollution, watersheds, fire mitigation, debris flow, rivers, streams, and the estuary. The Community Solutions Committee addresses issues directly affecting the community, with a major focus on women's issues, such as State and Federal legislation, education, health and safety, as well as respite care relief fund and a Caregiver meeting once a month. The VWC also sponsors special events such as the Redwood Mountain Fair, which celebrates community and showcases music and the arts. In conjunction with Save our Shores, the River and Road Clean-up reduces pollution in the San Lorenzo Valley's waterways to prevent pollution from washing into Monterey Bay. The Native Habitat Committee sponsors education to re-establish native habitat, reforestation, and pollinator garden routes throughout the Valley. The Committee also holds an Annual Native Plant Faire, focusing on repopulating the native habitat environment of our Redwood Valley. The Education Committee works closely with our local schools to support and provide opportunities for students to receive scholarships and our teachers to receive grants based on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) studies. VWC projects also raise funds for outdoor education and Science Camps within the district.The Board of Directors manages the VWC, and all activities are funded by donations, membership, and grants. A quarterly newsletter, website, and emails keep the members and friends of VWC informed of activities and volunteer opportunities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 39.5%; rating input score 39; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $244K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 39/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.