Valley Womens Club Association of San Lorenzo Valley Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942900221
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Ben Lomond, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8313351782
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $286,866
- Expenses
- $267,863
- Assets
- $357,693
- Liabilities
- $8,650
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dawn Harker (Co-President)
- Kathryn Gafford (Co-President)
- Elizabeth Marzili (Co-President)
People named in this filing
- Alisan Andrews (Treasurer)
- Roberta McPherson (Ex Secretary)
- Nancy Macy (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to community action, awareness and leadership in environmental, educational, social and political concerns that affect the health and welfare of the San Lorenzo Valley and our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Valley Women's Club (VWC) of the San Lorenzo Valley is dedicated to community action, awareness, and leadership in environmental, educational, social, and political concerns that affect the health and welfare of the San Lorenzo Valley and our community. The VWC sponsors a wide range of special events relating to its mission, including the annual Environmental Town Hall, Candidate's Forums, workshops, and forums that address erosion, pollution, watersheds, fire mitigation, debris flow, rivers, streams, and the estuary. The Community Solutions Committee addresses issues directly affecting the community, with a major focus on women's issues, such as State and Federal legislation, education, health and safety, as well as respite care relief fund and a Caregiver meeting once a month. The VWC also sponsors special events such as the Redwood Mountain Fair, which celebrates community and showcases music and the arts. In conjunction with Save our Shores, the River and Road Clean-up reduces pollution in the San Lorenzo Valley's waterways to prevent pollution from washing into Monterey Bay. The Native Habitat Committee sponsors education to re-establish native habitat, reforestation, and pollinator garden routes throughout the Valley. The Committee also holds an Annual Native Plant Faire, focusing on repopulating the native habitat environment of our Redwood Valley. The Education Committee works closely with our local schools to support and provide opportunities for students to receive scholarships and our teachers to receive grants based on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) studies. VWC projects also raise funds for outdoor education and Science Camps within the district.The Board of Directors manages the VWC, and all activities are funded by donations, membership, and grants. A quarterly newsletter, website, and emails keep the members and friends of VWC informed of activities and volunteer opportunities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 39.5%; rating input score 39; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $244K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 39/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.