Valley Verde

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453084814
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4088311481
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$442,252
Expenses
$704,283
Assets
$422,167
Liabilities
$437

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Olivia Nunez (President/Treas)

Highest reported compensation

  • Lovepreet Kaur (Executive Dir.): $115,363 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Valley verde increases self-sufficiency, health, and resilience, through a culturally informed community based food system to promote food justice.

What it reported doing in 2025

Shared garden program: valley verde partners with schools in underserved neighborhoods. Children are taught to garden at school, while their parents garden at home. Families enrolled in the program are provided raised-bed gardens at home, along with the supplies needed to grow fresh vegetables; such as soil, compost, irrigation systems, and seedlings. Families attend a full year of monthly workshops where they learn about best practices in organic urban agriculture. We also share ideas for healthy, affordable and delicious meals. In addition to building skills, workshops are an opportunity to build a stronger sense of community with otherfamilies. After the first year, many home gardening alumni stay involved by pickingup free seedlings each season for their home gardens and continuing to receivetechnical advice from the valley verde community. Deep roots: after a year of participation in the shared garden program, participantsare eligible to participate in the deep roots program, where they learn advanced gardening skills, such as propagating, seed germination, and water conservation. It's a six month program. Super jardineros: a two-year apprenticeship program for deep roots program alumni.participants learn entrepreneurship and job skills training as apprentices and learn to grow commercial-quality organic seedlings. The seedlings are used to supply the shared garden program and/or are sold to the public. The seedlings that are grown reflect the cultural preferences of santa clara county's largest ethnic groups, i.e. Mexican, vietnamese, indian, chinese, and filipino. Homeland nursery: valley verde started it's own nursery in 2021. Community members can purchase multi-ethnic vegetable seedlings for their garden.composting: underserved community members are eligible to participate in the six month composting program, where they learn how to turn food waste into compost using a compost bin or a worm bin.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -59.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $583K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.