Valley Sheltered Workshop
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362595884
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Batavia, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6308792359
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $384,610
- Expenses
- $383,517
- Assets
- $1,402,515
- Liabilities
- $38,398
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HUGO SALTIJERAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LARRY JONES (BOARD PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- HUGO SALTIJERAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $83,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Valley sheltered workshop provides training and rehabilitationthrough a work program to developmentally disabled and/orphysically handicapped adult individuals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Valley sheltered workshop provides training and rehabilitation through a work program for developmentally disabled and/or physically handicapped adult individuals which results in providing donations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 21
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.7%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 33.3%; rating input score 33
- Fundraising efficiency: $841.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.66; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.7% of revenue deployed · 33.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.