Valley Physicians Group
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421770868
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Campbell, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4089792927
- Rating
- 28
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $882,943
- Expenses
- $318,049
- Assets
- $1,585,414
- Liabilities
- $2,193
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rachel Ruiz (President)
- Praveen Anchala (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Rachel Ruiz (President): $60,000 total reported compensation
- Praveen Anchala (Vice President): $30,000 total reported compensation
- Eon Rios (Treasurer): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Establish and maintain a positive and effective voice in regards to the optimal care of our patients as well as physician practice and professional standards. This will be established and conducted with ongoing participation from Santa Clara County and Valley Medical Center including administration, design, implementation and supervision of clinical programs, information technology (including electronic medical records) and health care strategy.Educate group members regarding issues of benefits and clinical programs. Promote continuing education, professional development and excellence in medical practice for the welfare and benefit of our patients and the community. Establish and conduct ongoing working relationships with other employee unions at Valley Medical Center to coordinate efforts and strategies.Promote and fund local initiatives and campaigns during political elections consistent with goals and values of the group and work collaboratively with Santa Clara County, all allied
What it reported doing in 2024
Valley Physicians Group with ongoing participation from Santa Clara County and Valley Medical Center maintains a positive and effective voice in regards to the optimal care of its patients as well as physician practice and professional standards.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 23.1%; rating input score 23; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.98; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 21 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 13 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 23/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.