Valley Orthopaedic Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 956137468
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Calexico, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7609709008
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,288
- Expenses
- $793,552
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gerardo C Guzman (President)
People named in this filing
- Gerardo C Guzman (President)
- Ellen Villanueva (Director)
- Ramona Navarro (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The valley orthopedic clinic provides orthopedic, eye care services, and plastic surgery to indigent minor children, primarily from mexico. Volunteer surgeons and specialist from san diego and los angeles areas, who donate both time and travel perform examinations and some medical assistance for patients in clinic provided facilities.prosthetic devices, braces and orthopedic shoesare provided to patients at no charge. Where surgery or additional treatment that cannot be provided in the area is required, transportation is provide by the clinic.
What it reported doing in 2022
The Valley Orthopedic Clinic provides orthopedic, eye care services, and plastic surgery to indigent minor children, primarily from Mexico. Volunteer surgeons and specialist from the San Diego and Los Angeles areas, who donate both time and travel perform examinations and some medical assistance for patients in clinic provided facilities. Prosthetic devices, braces, and orthopedic shoes are provided to patients at no charge. Where surgery or additional treatment that cannot be provided in the area is required, transportation is provided by the clinic. Attached is a list of services provided. Expenses relating to various services are not readily separable and a clear separation has not been maintained.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,389.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $785K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.