Valley Junior Athletic Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237009864
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Syracuse, NY, USA
Phone
3152250582
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Soccer

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,284
Expenses
$13,045
Assets
$3,019

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACK KAPLAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACK KAPLAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JAY JILLSON (TREASURER)
  • LEE MASSENZIO (DIRECTOR OF SOCCER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Valley junior athletic association inc is a non-competitive youth sports league for children ages 4 - 16 in the valley of syracuse, ny interested in playing baseball, soccer and basketball when offered. Enrollment varies from 175 youth interested in playing baseball to 350 youth participating in playing soccer. The baseball season operates february through august. Soccer season is from april through october. Basketball season operates october through april. The overall purpose is to help the youth learn the sports rules and how to play in a team setting without the stress and pressure of needing to always be the winning team. Valley junior athletic association inc is utilizes the coaches and parents to help the youth learn the games through encouragement of not giving up but reinforcing the youth that the next time will be better as they practice more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: Filed program service accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.