Valley Health Team Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942217261
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Joaquin, CA, USA
Phone
5596932462
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,882,040
Expenses
$49,451,997
Assets
$91,817,923
Liabilities
$31,026,139

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Soyla Reyna Griffin (Chief Executive Officer)
  • Surjit Virdi (Board President)
  • Mary Ellen Pumarejo (Board Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Soyla Reyna Griffin (Chief Executive Officer): $665,045 total reported compensation
  • Husam Kaileh (Chief Medical Officer): $450,688 total reported compensation
  • Ronald E Dominguez (Associate Medical Director): $420,646 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner regardless of ability to pay.

What it reported doing in 2024

Valley Health Team, Inc. has a significant presence in rural communities in Fresno, Tulare and Inyo Counties with health centers in the towns of San Joaquin, Kerman, Firebaugh, Clovis, Fresno, Kingsburg, Tranquillity, Bishop, and Dinuba. During the fiscal year, Valley Health Team provided 167,254 visits to over 37,551 unduplicated patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.7%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.7% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $665K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.