Valley Baptist Medical Center Harlingen Auxiliary Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452697707
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Harlingen, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9563891193
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,724
- Expenses
- $55,351
- Assets
- $1,125,625
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINE CAREY (PRESIDENT)
- IRMA MONDRAGON (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KATIE MCCARTY (DIRECTOR)
- CHRISTINE CAREY (PRESIDENT)
- IRMA MONDRAGON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Valley baptist medical center harlingen auxiliary, inc was organized to provide care and comfort to hospital patients and their families and to provide educational and emergency assistance to medical professionals and support personnel, and to perform all other (con't) acts consistent with the nature of such organizational activitiy primarily through volunteer efforts.
What it reported doing in 2024
The auxiliary manages and supports programs that involve support and/or recognition to employees and patients. These programs include a) contributions to the tenet care fund where employees with a documented crisis can apply for assistance with basic living, funeral or medical expenses that the employee has no other way to fund b)guardian angel program where patients can make a donation in honor of a hospital staff member for the excellent care provided to them. The employee is recognized with a guardian angel pin and the donor receives confirmation of the donation and presentation to the employee. Donations are added to the auxiliary's scholarship fund c)no one dies alone (noda) program provides the reassuring presence of a volunteer companion to dying patients who would otherwise be alone d)veterans visiting veterans is a program where veteran volunteers make personalized visits to inpatients who are veterans. In addition to the support provided through the personal visit, patients are offered puzzle books, playing cards, prayer cards, blankets and caps specific to the military branch served; e)child-adult abuse response team (caart)-the hospital based caart unit at valley baptist serves child and adult abuse victims of the rio grande valley. The auxillary supports the caart year round with stuffed animals, coloring books, hygiene kits and clothing for the patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 72.8%; rating input score 73; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.34; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.