Vallecito Nordic Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943435068
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Durango, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9704268764
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parks and Playgrounds
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $195,434
- Expenses
- $51,679
- Assets
- $224,539
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GARY GIANNINY (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC PEIRSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DOUG ALLEN (CONTACTOR FOR MACHINE)
- GARY GIANNINY (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC PEIRSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vallecito nordic club (vnc) is organized for the purpose of providing groomed nordic ski trails for the public to enjoy on the east side of vallecito reservoir, at the community of vallecito in la plata county Colorado. The lands groomed are a combination of u.s. Forest service and bureau of reclamation lands. The vnc operates through donations from it's members and sponsors; and with the cooperation of the above federal land agencies and the pine river irrigation district. The volunteer grooming provides 10 -15 kilometers of skate and classic ski trails for winter recreation opportunities on public lands, this trail system provides for a healthy winter outing for locals and visitors to the area.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing free nordic ski lessons twice each winter, one of which is associated with a free demo days nordic skievent.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 73.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.34; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.