Vacavilles Imagine That
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465002663
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Vacaville, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7076287835
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Physical & Earth Sciences,
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,206
- Expenses
- $149,807
- Assets
- $124,197
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lauren J Runow (President)
People named in this filing
- Lauren J Runow (President)
- Laura McGuire (Director)
- Christopher W Runow (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Enrich the lives of children in the field of science by providing hands-on learning and exploration.
What it reported doing in 2020
Operated a "Hands On Learning and Exploration" center in Vacaville, California. This is a creative outlet helping kids (of all ages) learn to think outside the box and expand their minds. All exhibits revolve around science, art, health, and astronomy. This year the center welcomed fewer visitors than in prior years because of COVID-19.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.9% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.