Vaad Refuah
Legal name: Vaad Ltzorchay Refuah
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201020908
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, United States
- Phone
- (877) 973-3824
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $195,171
- Expenses
- $174,542
- Assets
- $170,276
- Liabilities
- $651
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LEAH KRAUSZ (CEO)
People named in this filing
- RABBI CHAIM ISRAEL (Chairman)
- LEAH KRAUSZ (CEO)
- JOSEPH GOLDBURD (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Vaad Refuah, we believe that every patient deserves safe, compassionate, and high-quality care. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit advocacy organization, we work tirelessly to ensure better healthcare outcomes for our community—advocating for patients during hospital stays and promoting preventive care to save lives and improve health for all.
What it reported doing in 2025
Informing the public on health issues and helping the sick in hospitals. We are providing aid and comfort to the sick as well as having people stay with the patients in the hospitals and other facilities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 49.2%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 44% of revenue deployed · 49.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.