Uyghur American Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541853876
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2024781902
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,726
- Expenses
- $263,127
- Assets
- $1,944
- Liabilities
- $139
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ilshat Hassan Kokbore (President)
- Alim Setoff (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Omer Kanat (Secretary)
- Ilshat Hassan Kokbore (President)
- Abdul Gheene (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
UAA works to promote the preservation and flourishing of a rich, humanistic and diverse Uyghur culture and to support the right of the Uyghur people to use peaceful, democratic means to determine their own political future.
What it reported doing in 2015
UAAs Uyghur Human Rights Project produced two in-depth reports and two briefings. A report on bilingual education was launched with a panel discussion in Washington, DC in May 2015 and in December 2015 UHRP released a report on political prisoners featuring profiles of eight prisoners of conscience as well as a petition for their release, which was also translated into Chinese. The two briefings were an alternate report for Chinas review before the UN Committee on Torture, as well as an analysis of Chinas New Counter-Terrorism law. The reports were distributed electronically to over 3,000 recipients on the email list and made available on the website. Hard copies were also printed and distributed. UHRP issued several dozen press releases in both Chinese and English. Media outlets such as Voice of America, CNN, MSNBC, South China Morning Post, Al-Jazeera, the Economist, Reuters, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal cited the press releases. UAA engaged in social media outreach over Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and a message board maintained on the UAA website. UHRP also published dozens of blog posts in Chinese and English, and produced new installments in a multimedia oral history project. In the ongoing initiative to connect Uyghur rights advocacy with Chinese democracy supporters, UHRP continued to develop its Chinese website and released new original research in Chinese. UHRPs Chinese Twitter has attracted thousands of followers in China and globally, and the Chinese website has in some months surpassed traffic to the English site. The Chinese Outreach Coordinator addressed Chinese democracy activists in several conferences and increased the prominence of Uyghur human rights within Chinese democracy forums. For outreach and advocacy, UHRP staff spoke at a number of NGO and academic forums, and published writing in diverse online forums. UAA worked and met with Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Initiatives for China, the U.S. Department of State, CECC, UNPO, Reporters Without Borders, the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, UNHCR, Human Rights in China, the International Campaign for Tibet and Freedom House, among many others. UAA organized many well-attended events for the Uyghur American community. The events ranged from those with a cultural focus, such as Uyghur New Year and National Day to those with a more activist character, such as demonstrations. Uyghur community ties in the United States were kept strong by the mobilizing actions of UAA. The organization offers moral support to Uyghur residents in the USA that is invaluable to maintaining a healthy and productive Uyghur contribution to American life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,915.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $254K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.