Uvalde Welfare and Recreation Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814431433
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Uvalde, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9562416155
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,567
- Expenses
- $66,260
- Assets
- $9,707
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID SALINAS JR (President)
- DANE JOHN (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- DAVID SALINAS JR (President)
- DANE JOHN (Vice President)
- RICHARD DADD (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Uvalde welfare and recreation is an exempt organization composed of a volunteer board of directors who are also all uvalde border patrol agents and give back to the community through scholarships. The scholarship funds awarded to area students are raised by the organization's two annual golf tournaments. Scholarships are awarded to high school students who apply. This application consists of a one page essay where the applicants explain how the candidate would benefit from the scholarship. The board reviews the applications and makes selections based on certain criteria.
What it reported doing in 2024
Uvalde welfare and recreation awarded $8,000 in scholarships to high school seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.5%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 12
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -60.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -56.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -95.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.5% of revenue deployed · 12.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.