Uumc Child Development Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853554735
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8179268706
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,480,727
- Expenses
- $1,443,457
- Assets
- $527,719
- Liabilities
- $369
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- COURTNEY HANELINE (CDC DIRECTOR): $34,973 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE MORGAN (CDC DIRECTOR): $26,667 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Uumc cdc is a faith-based child development center for young children and their family. We believe early childhood is a critical period of life during which children learn an enormous amount about their everyday world. The cdc's goal is to create an environment in which the child's self-esteem is nurtured, his/her curiosity about the world is challenged, and his/her relationships with others and god are given opportunity for growth.
What it reported doing in 2024
Uumc cdc is a faith-based child development center for young children ages 6 weeks to pre-k providing a safe and spiritually enriching environment for children of working parents. We believe early childhood is a critical period of life during which children learn an enormous amount about their everyday world. The cdc's goal is to create an environment in which the child's self-esteem is nurtured, his/her curiosity about the world is challenged, and his/her relationships with others and god are given opportunity for growth. The cdc is open from 7:30 to 5:30 and provides year round care. In the 2024/2025 fiscal year, the organization provided care to approximately 95 children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.