Utility Workers Union of America Local
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061299938
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Milford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2032140328
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $609,548
- Expenses
- $446,635
- Assets
- $821,096
- Liabilities
- $36,239
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARC LEWANDOWSKI (PRESIDENT)
- MOSES RAMS (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)
Highest reported compensation
- MOSES RAMS (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN): $34,990 total reported compensation
- SHELLEY ROBINSON (TREASURER): $23,327 total reported compensation
- SIOBHAN SPRINGER (V.P. CCC/EXEC. VP): $22,883 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See attached explanation
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of the union shall be to organize all of the eligible employees engaged by the united illuminating company, lng controllers (southern ct gas-milford), the bridgeport energy plant and pseg power Connecticut, llc (public service enterprise group - at the bridgeport and new haven harbor stations), their successors, subsidiaries or as merged. To increase their wages, improve their hours, and generally, to better their working conditions. To do whatever is proper and necessary to protect the economic and social welfare of its members. To support and initiate any and all legislation affecting the economic security of its members. To establish a spirit of brotherhood among its members in the enhancement of their social, economic, financial and cultural status.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 20 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.