Utility Workers Union of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131122317
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2125754400
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,007,594
- Expenses
- $10,979,408
- Assets
- $15,879,646
- Liabilities
- $7,269,273
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
53 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRANK MORALES (PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS A MARTIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JAMES SHILLITTO (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- FRANK MORALES (PRESIDENT): $273,879 total reported compensation
- THOMAS A MARTIN (VICE PRESIDENT): $267,372 total reported compensation
- STEVEN D'AURIA (SECRETARY TREASURER): $257,149 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Local 1-2 represents workers in collective bargining with utility companies operating the the New York city area and westchecter.
What it reported doing in 2025
The local 1-2 union represents approximately 7800 members in collective bargining with employers with respect to wages, benefits and working conditions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 30 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $274K · 53 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $399K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 53 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.