Utah Veterinary Medical Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 876163647
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8013772890
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,183
- Expenses
- $75,884
- Assets
- $269,889
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN NELSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN BENSON (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAMIE REES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAUL TONIOLLI DVM (OFFICER)
- KERRY ROOD DVM (OFFICER)
- SUSAN NELSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance the science of veterinary medicine through continuing education of association members, germane legislative influence, seminars, workshops, and newsletters.
What it reported doing in 2024
The association provides continuing education for association members and conferences to advance the common interests of the constituency, along with public events, to improve animal health through awareness and prevention.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.5%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.56; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.5% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.