Utah Society of Dermatologic Medicine & Surgery
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870675968
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8014298000
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $123,588
- Expenses
- $76,085
- Assets
- $489,092
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARGARET HAMMOND MD (PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY WILSON MD (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- MARGARET HAMMOND MD (PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY WILSON MD (PRESIDENT EL)
- ANGELA BRIMHALL MD (TREASURER SE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was started as a way to unify the dermatologists in the state of Utah with the intent to increase educational learning and provide resources to help the physicians increase the quality of the practice of dermatology. This is to assure the best possible care for patients with dermatologic conditinos who need educational information, medical treatment, and/or surgical intervention. The organization also includes residents in dermatology as well as any medical professionals with an interest in skin disease.
What it reported doing in 2025
The societys primary activity is a yearly educational meeting using available resources to bring in prominent dermatologists from around the country to lecture and increase education, and thereby increase the quality of dermatologic care in the state of Utah.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.1%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.43; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.1% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.