Utah Scottish Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942462362
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8019424001
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,623
- Expenses
- $34,857
- Assets
- $64,568
- Liabilities
- $5,012
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary McLarty (President)
- Brooke Montgomery (Vice President)
- Dan Hill (Vice President)
- Tammi Hilll (Vice President)
- Dan Stuart (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Mary McLarty (President)
- Brooke Montgomery (Vice President)
- Dan Hill (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to celebrate and promote the customs, civilization, andachievements of Scottish heritage.Our vision is to be the premier cultural association in Utah by weldingScottish cultural traditions into a viable present and advancing aheritable future.Values: Kinship, Education, Integrity, and Philanthropy.
What it reported doing in 2020
Lehi GamesOpen to members and the public, includes live national and local Scottishand Celtic entertainers, dancers, pipers, and athletics. Professionaljudges evaluate world class teams and individuals who compete foroutstanding prizes. Vendors provide authentic Scottish food and othersouvenir items. World records have been and continue to be set at thesegames for all levels of events. Attendance of the events typically totalover 8,000 individuals, despite the sometimes unpredictable and inclimateweather.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -77.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.