Utah Quarter Horse Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870480697
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Farmington, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8016827521
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,795
- Expenses
- $166,202
- Assets
- $109,965
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marty Simper (President)
- Jeff Stulce (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Marty Simper (President)
- Jeff Stulce (Vice President)
- Marla Fadel (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Utah Quarter Horse Association, Inc. (the "Association), is a Utah non-profit corporation dedicated to promoting, preserving and fostering awareness in, and enjoyment of, the American Quarter Horse. In doing so, the Association seeks to provide wide availability for these opportunities and experiences to members of the general public who share these common desires and goals, through allowing membership in the Association. Opportunity for membership is open to the general public, without regard to race, religion, gender or national origin.The Association is affiliated with the American Quarter Horse Association ("AQHA"). Through that affiliation, members of the Association, and their American Quarter Horses participate in many AQHA events, such as the showing of horses, Versatility Ranch, and riding programs. In addition, many members enjoy other activities with their Quarter Horses, such as: roping. cutting, trail riding, ranching, hunting and the like.The Association also sponsors
What it reported doing in 2024
Horse showing activities including youth divisions
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.